翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Yates High School ・ Yates Mill ・ Yates Oil Field ・ Yates Polytechnic Institute ・ Yates Professor of Classical Art and Archaeology ・ Yates Racing ・ Yates Spring ・ Yates Spur ・ Yates Stirling ・ Yates Stirling, Jr. ・ Yates Tavern ・ Yates Township ・ Yates Township, McLean County, Illinois ・ Yates Township, Michigan ・ Yates v. United States ・ Yates v. United States (2015) ・ Yates's ・ Yates's correction for continuity ・ Yates, Montana ・ Yates, New York ・ Yates, West Virginia ・ Yatesboro, Pennsylvania ・ Yatesbury ・ Yatesula ・ Yatesville ・ Yatesville Dam ・ Yatesville Lake State Park ・ Yatesville Methodist Church ・ Yatesville, Georgia ・ Yatesville, Pennsylvania Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Yates v. United States (2015) ： ウィキペディア英語版 Yates v. United States (2015) ''Yates v. United States'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court construed 18 U.S.C. § 1519, a provision added to the federal criminal code by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to criminalize the destruction or concealment of "any record, document, or tangible object" to obstruct a federal investigation. By a 5-to-4 vote, the Court stated that the term "tangible object" as used in this section means an object used to record or preserve information, and that this did not include fish.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. ___ (2015) )〕 == Background == Petitioner John L. Yates, a commercial fisherman, was operating in the Gulf of Mexico when a federal agent conducted an offshore inspection and found that the ship's catch had undersized red grouper, in violation of United States federal conservation regulations. The federal agent instructed Captain Yates to keep the undersized fish segregated; Yates instructed his crew to throw the undersized fish overboard, resulting in Yates being charged under 18 United States Code §1519. This provision, originating from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, states that a person may be fined or imprisoned for up to 20 years if the person "knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence" a federal investigation.〔 At trial, Yates sought an acquittal for the §1519 charge arguing that fish were not tangible objects related to record-keeping. The District Court denied the acquittal motion. Yates was found guilty by a jury of violating §1519 and sentenced to 30 days' imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction, holding that fish have a physical form and are therefore a tangible object under a dictionary definition.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Yates v. United States (2015)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.